top of page

SMART IRB

 BUSINESS ANALYSIS 

 USER RESEARCH 

 INTERACTION DESIGN 

 AGILE 

Founded in 2008, Harvard Catalyst is one of 61 Clinical and Translational Science Centers (CTSC) in the United States. Funded by a NIH grant, Harvard University, and local hospitals, Harvard Catalyst's mission is to further clinical and translational research by providing clinical and translational researchers with training programs, grants, tools and technologies.

As the Design Lead on the Portal Team, I worked on multiple projects, including the SMART IRB initiative. SMART IRB aims to streamline the institutional review board (IRB) process for clinical studies by reducing the need for duplicative reviews. We built a web-based platform to identify a single IRB for multisite clinical studies in support of the recent NIH mandate for single IRB review of NIH funded research studies.   

The SMART IRB team adopted an agile software development process in order to move quickly. While the majority of efforts have been focused on design, development, and QA, we made time to conduct user research as well.

My Role:
  • Collaborate with stakeholders and internal team on design solutions 

  • Continuously refine Design process and deliverables to meet the needs of stakeholders and internal team

  • Served as proxy Product Owner by prioritizing features and triaging tickets into and out of the Sprint

  • Demo to external stakeholders

  • Collect feedback from end users through surveys, usability testing, interviews

  • Create training materials such as camtasia videos, knowledgebase articles and help documents

Key Milestones

Phase 1

Join IRBrely Project

Conducted 15 remote usability tests with potential users to evaluate IRBrely. View protocol

Get up to speed on IRB reliance and work done to date.

Usability testing

Harvard Catalyst joins IRBrely

IRBrely grant ends

Deliver code

With the close of the IRBrely grant, Catalyst handed off the code and specs to NCATS.

Phase 3

Phase 2

Refocus on local cede review system

Local cede review system

Building on work for IRBrely, we began re-writing our local system.

Interview Users

Onsite interviews with 11 local IRB Directors.

Catalyst wins SMART IRB grant

Going national

Refocused our development efforts to suit the needs of a national audience.

Working Group

Form Working Group comprised of stakeholders from across the nation.

Conduct 3 pilot studies to seek feedback.

Pilot Studies

Website + Joinder launch

SMART IRB launches website and Joinder

Launched SMART IRB website and Joinder tool, which allows institutions to sign onto SMART IRB.

2017

Online Reliance System (ORS) in Beta

ORS launched to Beta on May 4, 2017.

Online Reliance System Beta

Webinar series

Multiple webinar series to educate community about SMART IRB.

User Survey

Solicit feedback from active Beta users.

Prod. launch

Launch Online Reliance System to production Jan 23, 2018.

ORS Production launch

New feature development

Iterative enhancements based on user feedback.

Our Users

I’d like to collaborate on a study with my colleagues at Ridgeview Research Facility and Belledale Institute.

I’d like to collaborate on a study with my colleagues at Ridgeview Research Facility and Belledale Institute.

I want to make it easier for my investigators to conduct multi-site research by reducing the administrative burden of multiple IRB reviews.

Steps to building a new feature

1. Review list of priorities

Periodically review the list of priorities with the Working Group, product owner and internal team, and re-order the list as priorities change.

2. Meet with Working Group

One month prior to development of new feature, discuss the goals and problems that will be addressed by this feature.

3. Review with Product Owner

Regroup with the Product Owner to understand the concerns brought up by Working Group to establish the requirements for this new feature.

4. Review with development team

Check-in with the development team to let them know what we’ll be working on next. Developers provide feedback on early design ideas and suggest alternatives. QA help us to find gaps in design.

5. Iterate based on feedback

Feedback from Product Owner and development team is incorporated into draft wireframes. Sometimes multiple iterations are necessary.  

6. Present final design

Present the final design to Product owner for sign off. Pass final wireframes and specs to developers and QA so they can begin their work.

Selected Artifacts

User Flows

Workflow diagram showing the entire process from submitting a IRB reliance request to receiving a reliance determintation.

Wireframes

An early wireframe showing a possible layout for the cede request form.

A wireframe of the cede request details page. This page would be updated as institutions submitted their reliance forms. 

Mockups

A final mockup of the cede request details page, showing a final reliance determination has been made. 

Back
bottom of page